Re: CINT .L problem
Jacek M. Holeczek (holeczek@us.edu.pl)
Mon, 17 May 1999 10:23:05 +0200 (MET DST)
> ( ... )
> { TH1F *h_tpat= new TH1F(); }
>
> The page:
>
> http://root.cern.ch/root/CintInterpreter.html
>
> says:
>
> " .... CINT as Macro Processor ...
> . . .
>
> Lets start with a macro containing a simple list of statements
> (like the multi command line example given in the previous section).
> T h i s t y p e o f m a c r o m u s t s t a r t w i t h
> a "{" a n d e n d w i t h a "}".
> . . . "
>
>
> Please correct me,
O.K., you asked for it.
38 lines below you can read:
N o t i c e t h a t n o s u r r o u n d i n g "{" a n d "}"
a r e r e q u i r e d i n t h i s c a s e.
Anyhow, the problem is NOT whether there should be parentheses or not,
but that Masa claims HIS root/cint initializes the pointer upon ".L",
while MINE does NOT.
Jacek.