Re: problem with CINT `**' extension
Pasha Murat (murat@cdfsga.fnal.gov)
Mon, 7 Dec 1998 16:50:36 -0600 (CST)
Dear Urs, you're definitely right, but this doesn't make the life safer
- a simple misprint could lead to the results being completely
screwed up. I think there should be kind of check of argument validity range,
otherwise one gets:
root [28] 9999999999+9999999999
(int)(-2)
-regards, pasha.
Urs Langenegger writes:
>
> I think that has less to do with '**' but with (int). If I cast onto
> (double), everything works fine for me.
>
> Cheers,
> --U.